Cost Plus Technologies
πŸ›‘οΈ Security Excellence

Accreditation & Compliance

Enterprise-Grade Assurance Through Documentation Excellenceβ„’

Because real security is measured in artifacts.

Overview

At Cost Plus Technologies, accreditation is not just a milestone β€” it's a continuous journey of form completion, spreadsheet maintenance, and interpretive compliance.

Our software platforms are designed from day one to support:

β€’ Federal accreditation pathways

β€’ Enterprise governance frameworks

β€’ Multi-domain authorization strategies

β€’ Artifact-driven security

We specialize in transforming working systems into binders.

Our Accreditation Philosophy

We believe security is best achieved through:

βœ“ Checklists

βœ“ Templates

βœ“ Cross-referenced control matrices

βœ“ Repeated screenshots

βœ“ Multiple versions of the same document

Rather than focusing on runtime risk, we emphasize:

Pre-runtime paperwork saturation.

Supported Frameworks

We proudly align with:

NIST 800-53 (rev whichever)NIST 800-171RMFCMMCFedRAMP (in principle)Zero Trust (as a concept)DevSecOps (as a slide)

Our approach is framework-agnostic, buzzword-compatible, and audit-ready.

Our Process

Phase I – Control Mapping

We begin by mapping every system capability to every possible control, regardless of relevance.

This produces:

β€’ 300+ control statements

β€’ 600+ inherited controls

β€’ 12 spreadsheets

β€’ 1 Jira epic

Phase II – Artifact Generation

Our team produces required artifacts including:

β€’ System Security Plans

β€’ Control Implementation Statements

β€’ Architecture Diagrams (three versions)

β€’ Network Diagrams (outdated immediately)

β€’ Data Flow Diagrams (aspirational)

β€’ POA&Ms (pre-filled)

Each document undergoes:

β†’ Internal review

β†’ Peer review

β†’ Manager review

β†’ Formatting review

Phase III – Screenshot Harvesting

Live systems are carefully screenshotted to prove:

β€’ Logging exists

β€’ MFA once worked

β€’ Something is encrypted

β€’ A dashboard has graphs

All screenshots are timestamped and immediately obsolete.

Phase IV – Typos and Rejections

Artifacts are submitted for review and returned for:

β€’ Font inconsistencies

β€’ Missing commas

β€’ Incorrect acronyms

β€’ "Please clarify" comments

β€’ Requests to restate already stated content

This phase repeats indefinitely.

Phase V – Authorization Theater

Authorization decisions are made by stakeholders who:

β€’ Have never used the system

β€’ Do not understand the architecture

β€’ Require additional diagrams

Approval granted pending remediation of cosmetic findings.

Continuous Monitoring

Once authorized, we enter Continuous Monitoring Modeβ„’, which includes:

β€’ Monthly scans

β€’ Quarterly reports

β€’ Annual reassessments

β€’ Ongoing POA&M growth

Actual security posture changes are optional.

DevSecOps Integration

We embed accreditation into our CI/CD pipelines by:

β€’ Generating compliance artifacts automatically

β€’ Running tools nobody reads

β€’ Producing dashboards nobody checks

β€’ Opening tickets nobody closes

This ensures our delivery velocity remains safely constrained.

Accreditation Deliverables

Customers can expect:

βœ… SSPs exceeding 200 pages

βœ… Control traceability matrices

βœ… Evidence folders with nested ZIP files

βœ… Weekly compliance syncs

βœ… Multiple "final" versions

βœ… Slide decks explaining slide decks

Why Cost Plus Technologies

We don't just pursue accreditation.

We operationalize it.

Our team brings decades of experience navigating:

β€’ Shifting guidance

β€’ Conflicting interpretations

β€’ Duplicate controls

β€’ Subjective assessments

We are experts in translating engineering reality into compliance fiction.

Leadership Commentary

"Security isn't about systems β€” it's about documentation," said Robert Sivilli, Founder & CEO of Cost Plus Technologies.

"Anyone can build software. We build binders."

Ready to Begin?

Contact our Accreditation Enablement Office:

accreditation@costplustechnologies.com

Please include:

β€’ Target framework

β€’ Desired ATO timeline

β€’ Tolerance for rework

β€’ Number of approvers

We'll take it from there.